The final stanza and the second stanza, however, reveal why there can be no detente between the staid and stodgy dog people and the curious, envelope-pushing cat people.
Curiosity will not cause us to die— only lack of it will. He harvests truth by being willing to make mistakes, to fail and fail and fail again, to endure the pain, to live the death, and come back from hell over and over again. The second stanza, however, foretells a deeper, darker truth: With nothing left to be curious about; with nothing left to taste, experience, and explore, the story of life grows stale — not worth the telling.
To distrust what is always said, what seems, to ask odd questions, interfere in dreams, leave home, smell rats, have hunches do not endear cats to those doggy circles where well-smelt baskets, suitable wives, good lunches are the order of things, and where prevails much wagging of incurious heads and tails.
The unpredictable cat lives mostly as he pleases, tempting fate rather than exist in a box of boring predictability. If he seems irresponsible, it is because he is willing to fail.
Curiosity may have killed the cat; more likely the cat was just unlucky, or else curious to see what death was like, having no cause to go on licking paws, or fathering litter on litter of kittens, predictably.
They put feet to their dreams and ideals, and do not count the cost.
The dog, on the other hand, lives closely within his comfort zone, where family, good food, and order, keep his doggy life safe, secure, and predictable. They are the misfits. Just as the fur flies when cats and dogs get together, so it often happens with people who live their lives on two different planes of philosophical and emotional existence.
And, as Bilbo Baggins observes in J. The author uses extremes and extreme opposites to make his point. Nevertheless, to be curious is dangerous enough. Curiosity and Cats and Dogs.
Also, sometimes the difference between being seen as irresponsible as opposed to responsible, is the outcome — whether you failed or succeeded. What Does it All Mean? That means there is no room in the poem for those who are neither of the cat nor dog persuasion.The poem entitled “Curiosity” written by Alastair Reid is a symbolic poem that uses cats as a metaphor for humans.
It relates felines to people in the sense of curiosity, and what could be considered actually living life to the fullest. Analysis. In the narrative poem “Curiosity” by Alastair Reid, it seems as if he is giving advice on life to the reader.
Reid uses figurative language here devised from the saying “curiosity killed the cat.” He speaks as if there are two kinds of characters in life, opposites naturally, like cats and dogs. Unlike most editing & proofreading services, we edit for everything: grammar, spelling, punctuation, idea flow, sentence structure, & more.
Get started now! Curiosity may have killed the cat. More likely, the cat was just unlucky, or else curious to see what death was like, having no cause to go on licking paws, or fathering litter on litter of kittens, predictably.
"Curiosity" By alastair reid curiosity Robert Frost defines great poetry: "A poem begins in delight, it inclines to the impulse, it assumes a direction with the first line laid down, it runs a course of lucky events, and ends in a clarification of life – not necessarily a great clarification, such as sects and cults are founded on, but in a momentary stay against.
Jan 23, · Okay. Curiosity and Cats and Dogs. What Does it All Mean? In the poem “Curiosity”, by Alastair Reid, the author uses not only opposites, but age-old enemies, as vehicles for his portrayal of two types of people – those who play it safe and don’t rock the boat, and those who take chances and rock.Download